首页> 外文OA文献 >False promises of co-production in neighbourhood regeneration: the case of Dutch community enterprises
【2h】

False promises of co-production in neighbourhood regeneration: the case of Dutch community enterprises

机译:在社区再生中联合生产的虚假承诺:以荷兰社区企业为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many European countries are implementing austerity measures alongside trends of welfare state retrenchment. Entrepreneurial forms of active citizenship are considered as a new form of public management to fill gaps left by spending cuts and to continue neighbourhood regeneration. Inspired by British practices, Dutch citizens are trying to set up community enterprises (CEs) to provide services or other benefits for residents in deprived neighbourhoods. Based on a qualitative panel study, this article reveals supportive responses but also resistance from local governments and housing associations. Within a positive policy discourse on co-production, institutional responses often encompass forms of ‘counter-production’ that hold CEs in full uncertainty about crucial conditions for their business.
机译:许多欧洲国家正在实施紧缩措施,同时福利国家紧缩。积极公民身份的企业家形式被视为一种新的公共管理形式,可以填补削减支出所留下的空白并继续进行社区重建。受英国做法的启发,荷兰公民正试图建立社区企业(CE),为贫困社区的居民提供服务或其他好处。基于定性小组研究,本文揭示了支持性回应,但也显示了地方政府和住房协会的抵制。在关于共同生产的积极政策讨论中,机构的回应通常包含“非共同生产”形式,这些形式使CE对其业务的关键条件完全不确定。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kleinhans, R.J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号